Wake Up! Leaders are Dreamers

Leaders are Dreamers

Risky Dreams 

“The limitations you are willing to accept determine the boundaries of your existence.” ~ Erwin McManus, Wide Awake

As I reflect on what I learned a few years ago in Erwins’ book Wide Awake, I am challenged, prodded and provoked to live and think differently.

I wonder this:

  • “Am I living too safely?”
  • “Am I leading too plainly?”
  • “Am I willing to dream again—bigger, better, bolder?”

Remember: Great leaders are born out of great dreams.

I Have a Dream

Some of those “great dreams” emerge from a creative idea. Jeff Bezos, in 1992, was a SVP for the New York hedge fund D.E. Shaw when he dreamt of building a company that would sell books on the Internet. Ever heard of Amazon?

Others are stirred deeply by injustice. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Harriet Tubman dreamed of freedom, battling slavery and racial oppression. It cost MLK his life.

Some dreams do that.

MADD as Hell

Not infrequently dreams are birthed in the midst of great tragedies. On May 3, 1980, Candy Lightner’s 13-year-old daughter, Cari, was killed by a hit-and-run drunk driver in Fair Oaks, California.

Angered by the relatively light sentence the driver received for his recklessness, she launched Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) which raises awareness of the damage wrought when driving under the influence of alcohol.

McManus says “a dream needs a person to bring it to life.”

An isolated dream will only fester in the heart of one person and eventually die; and sometimes it takes the dreamer with it.

———————————————————————————————

L2L Reader Survey 2013

———————————————————————————————

“L2L Blog has been extremely helpful in my professional development & I am
grateful to the experts who take the time to share their wisdom & resources so freely!”

———————————————————————————————

Living the Dream

Dying dreams are as contagious as living ones. How many of us have buried dreams only to realize that we have placed a bit of ourselves in the ground? A dream must be shared, embodied and empowered for it to be life-giving.

Dreams are intensely communal.

McManus provocatively says:

How long you live does not reflect how well you live. The real question is, were you alive when you died?

I love that question! And I fear it.

  • What if my dream fails?
  • What if no one else is inspired by my burning desire to live the dream?
  • What if my dream is just an illusion, a momentary fit of grandiosity and self-indulgence?

Becoming a Dreamer

We need to focus our energy and rekindle the fires

McManus notes the word focus comes from the Latin word for “hearth” or “fireplace” and thus means “the burning center.” What is the burning center of my life? To find it I must carve away distractions, cut off the peripheral could-do for the more central must-do. But the “do” must be centered in the “be” – what I am becoming.

Before I have a dream am I becoming a dreamer?

That takes some time and effort. Focus seems like a luxury only a well-subsidized artist can afford—someone who’s paid to paint one portrait, not run around frantically splashing paint on every blank canvas, hoping for a quick a sale.

Can we make the changes needed to be real dreamers? Are we willing to make a focused effort?

Build the Core with Focus

McManus tells the story of therapy he received for a back injury – to work on his stomach. It seemed odd but he soon understood that “core training” was key to a healthy back. POW’s learned to do it so they’d remain strong enough for a potential escape, but not look so strong in the arms that they’d pose a threat.

We need to work on our “core” – core beliefs, practices and convictions; core mission, vision and strategy. FOCUS! But it is not easy or glamorous, so I settle for superficial solutions and neglect the core.

“I think a lot of us choose the opposite path,” McManus chides. “We do the tanning booth and the Botox and the collagen so we can look healthy on the outside, but we are really weak at the center.”

Admittedly, I am weaker at the center than I’d care to admit. And, as a result, my team is not as strong. Because core training is best when we do it together, like Navy Seals prepping for the mission of their lives.

So What’s a Leader to Do?

There are no quick steps. But here are some routines that will help leaders dream with focus and persistence.

1)     Shore up Relationships at Home (or friends)

My wife and daughter come first (my son’s out of the house now). Centered relationships will let you dream freely, knowing you are caring for the fires at home before you try to save the world.

2)     Spend Some Money

Dreaming has a cost. I suggest 1-2 conferences or gatherings and books. I am in the process of ordering about 30-40 leadership resources for the coming months. This is a mix of biography, provocative thinkers, life shapers and students of culture, and personal growth materials. I need to hear other voices as I recalibrate my own.

3)     Do a Dreamers Inventory

What inspired you before? What are the roadblocks now? What gets you up in the morning and keeps you up at night? What can you do that others cannot do? What must be done? I live in these questions.

4)     Get Around Other Dreamers

Hanging out with I’m-building-the-dream-right-now-and-it-is-a-wild-ride kinds of people will light your fire and keep it burning. You know the type – upstart business leaders, creative teachers, provocative activists, church planters, artists without boundaries. (ESPECIALLY if they are not in your field!!!). I am doing it this week.

5)     Pull the Trigger

At some point you simply must act. I was recalling in my journal all the things I started in the last few years, some large, some small. Many “failed” or fizzled, or took an unexpected turn. Yes, I was frustrated, angry, disappointed, lost momentum, and almost threw in the towel. Actually, I did– but I picked up some new towels. I am not where I want to be – but I am moving!

 The real question is, “Were you alive when you died?”

**********

Never miss an issue of Linked 2 Leadership, subscribe today here.
Learn, Grow & Develop Other Leaders

———————
Dr. Bill Donahue
Dr. Bill Donahue is President of LeaderSync Group, Inc

Bill is a professor at TIU and a Leadership Speaker and Consultant
Email | LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook | Web

Image Sources: cdn.business2community.com

Matrix Leadership

Matrix Leadership

Research from the Hay Group has long focused on leadership competencies – in both for profit and non-profit settings. Whether leading a church, a company, a private school, or hospital, you are likely to need matrix-type leadership skills.

That’s because all these settings have 2 things in common:

  1. Specific leadership responsibilities within an area of expertise (sales, men’s ministry, customer service)
  2. The need to bring that expertise across the organization in a cross-functional setting.

Working with a complex, 2000-member church I have seen the need for senior leaders to have these skills. Consulting with a $100 million business with 400 employees, and guiding a leadership team at an urban non-profit, I witnessed the same challenges and needs.

So here is the question:

How do we lead people in non-hierarchical structures to accomplish personal and organizational goals?

Four Competencies

The Hay research identifies 4 competencies specifically needed in matrix settings:

Empathy:

The ability to identify with the perspectives and insights of others who hold different views

Conflict Management:

The ability to resolve issues and relational breakdown in mutually beneficial ways, aligned with institutional outcomes

Influence:

The ability to lead people when you do not have direct-line authority or supervision

Self-awareness:

Having enough personal insight to recognize when and how to engage others, manage emotions and understand personal strengths and weaknesses

(For more information on this kind of research see http://www.haygroup.com/ww/press/details.aspx?ID=33283)

Sounds good. But there is only one problem. The researchers found these competencies greatly lacking in many leaders, especially men. The percentage of leaders in the survey who demonstrated each competency are listed below:

  • Empathy: 22%
  • Conflict Management: 31%
  • Influence: 20%
  • Self-awareness: 9%

With so few leaders who are self-aware of their own abilities and relational capacities (or lack thereof), and lacking in influence and empathy, it is no wonder that matrix management approaches are difficult.

Acquiring New Skills

So how do we help leaders acquire some of these skills and manage the complexities associate with complex structures?

They suggest developing leaders by:

  • Placing them in diverse groups with people who share a variety of perspectives and opinions
  • Allowing them to shadow experienced leaders to expose them to new leadership worlds and diverse leadership styles
  • Providing a variety of leadership experiences where emerging leaders can lead (or share leadership) in areas outside their immediate skill sets and expertise

This makes sense, thought the pressures of day-to-day leadership will mitigate against it. Taking someone off-line from their normal responsibilities will require senior leaders to flex a bit, recognize short-term productivity losses or delays, and allow these leaders to fail along the way.

This takes time in the short run but has huge long-term payouts, if we are patient and willing to learn.

That is the challenge for go-getter, type-A “what’s next?” leaders. Development takes time.

But you either take the time to build the skills, or you take the time to clean up the matrix mess you will have with incompetent leaders managing complex situations. I can guarantee you want to spend the time on development rather than perpetual high-maintenance clean up activity.

Four Warnings

Be wary of idealizing the matrix approach. It is no panacea. In addition to the skills needed to lead within AND across an organization, there are some things to watch for. Ruth Malloy, a managing director at the Hay Group in Boston offers these insights.

1)     Identify competency gaps and correct them.

Know your weaknesses in leadership, especially in the four areas above. How self-aware am I? When can I use influence and how? Doing this as a team is a vital exercise.

2)     Don’t “pull rank” to solve an issue.

It is a temptation as a supervisor to use your authority to fix the problem or get your way. This short-circuits the process, stunts leader development and destroys trust. Let the process work.

3)     Deal with emotionally-charged issues face-to-face, not through email.

I have seen this so many times it makes me want to cringe. As I worked with leadership teams and groups it is amazing that even teams that meet regularly will use email to engage an emotional issue. It is a community-killer and team-breaker.

4)     Don’t take problems directly to the top (to the CEO or Senior Manager or Senior Pastor.)

Most of the time this backfires. Running to Big Brother to try to leverage his/her positional authority shows how desperate and ineffective you are at leading. Work the problem together and don’t play power games.

Taking Stock of Things

So today I am taking stock. I think I am good at empathy and strong in conflict management, but need to leverage my influence (I often underestimate it) and grow in self-awareness.

So I need to do some ruthless and honest work, asking those close to me this:

“How do you experience me, where do I make my best contribution, and how can I better understand what you need from me?”

Matrix management sounds cool and trendy. It is both. And it is effective, but only for those willing to do the work.

What are your competencies? How can you and your team grow? When will you take this research and discuss it as a team so you can move forward?

**********

Never miss an issue of Linked 2 Leadership, subscribe today here.
Learn, Grow & Develop Other Leaders

———————
Dr. Bill Donahue
Dr. Bill Donahue is President of LeaderSync Group, Inc

Bill is a professor at TIU and a Leadership Speaker and Consultant
Email | LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook | Web

Image Sources: wholesalechess.com

Leadership Transparency: When the Unexpected Happens

Hiding Under Desk

It is human nature to create our own reason to a problem when something unexpected happens and when we don’t know the true answer.  It is a survival instinct to explain the unexplained and to provide purpose to the unknown.

And when leaders don’t realize this human tendency, it can really damage morale and productivity in the workplace.

Understanding Leadership Roles

A few months ago I had a conversation on leadership capabilities with a General Manager that I have known for most of his career.  We discussed the different challenges for leaders depending on what type of organization they head.  I wanted to get his perspective on the differences he observed in leading his current organization versus leading the mainstream business.

When I mentioned a colleague’s recent move to lead a “turnaround” organization because the previous leader failed, he questioned my premise.

He defended the other leader and the organization.

  • He was adamant that the previous manager was a great leader
  • He insisted that the change was not a result of  any mistakes
  • He also argued that the organization was not in trouble

Getting to the Truth

But my colleague was uninformed and incorrect. He was just plain wrong. And I thought that he needed to know the truth. So having insight into the organization in question and having a long time relationship with this GM, I spent some time with my colleague and gave him the truth.

I was up front and told him that many people simply didn’t know the truth about the situation. And without enough communication on the subject matter, the reason for the leadership changes would probably not be clear to those who worked for the replaced leader. My friend who worked there simply believed something different than what actually took place because he didn’t have the facts.

So in communication the truth, my honesty provided a new perspective to this leader and he thanked me for giving him a new lens on being transparent.

When something unexpected happens and leaders don’t communicate enough, followers will make up their own story which may not paint the right picture.  The leader may think they have provided what’s needed but a high level statement will not be sufficient if it does not contain enough “why.

A Little Closer to Home

I serve on the Board of Directors of my Home Owners Association.  I could write a new reality show on the drama that exists in a community that appears from the outside to be a beautiful paradise.

I have learned that this is not uncommon in large communities.  Who knew?

Due to different circumstances during my tenure, we have had a lot of turnover on the Board and with the Association Manager.  In most circumstances, the board was not able to disclose the reason for the departures without legal risk.

I recently got to know one of my neighbors with a great network within the community.  She told me the various rumors that were circulating on the different departures.  I could not believe my ears.  The stories were so far from the truth, it floored me.

I asked her “how do people make this stuff up?”

When information is lacking, people will create their own version of what they believe to be the truth.  The more distrust in the leader, the more harmful the story.

Impacting Morale and Results

I recently had lunch with a colleague who works for a small company in the Midwest.  She shared an unfortunate example of lack of transparency and the impact.

The CEO of her company unexpectedly announced her departure.

The CEO’s statement followed by a scarce press release from PR created a whirlwind of water cooler talk filled with employees speculating if they should bail ship.  Stories being conjured up included lack of faith in the company, indiscretions, political aspirations, health issues and so on.

It has negatively impacted morale and productivity in a time where the company can’t afford to pause.

My colleague’s concern was that the true reason may never be known which could unintentionally shake the foundation of bench leaders or cause the company to go under.

A Better Way To Lead: Use Wisdom and Truth

Here are a few questions that can point to a better way to handle things:

  • Leaders need to consider when something unexpected happens, how much can and needs to be disclosed?
  • What do employees need in order to have trust?
  • How can a leader turn concern into contentment and acceptance?
  • If legal risks or confidentiality prevent details from being disclosed, what CAN be communicated?

Shortly after one of our Association Managers left unexpectedly and an angry crowd showed up at the board meeting demanding to bring her back, we disclosed that due to risk of litigation, we couldn’t provide details.

Amazingly the noise stopped!

We didn’t have to disclose the details, we just had to provide the “why”.

Have you experienced a leader being transparent in a rough situation that resulted in unexpected success?  What examples do you have of leaders not being transparent and the consequences?

**********

Never miss an issue of Linked 2 Leadership, subscribe today here! 
Learn, Grow & Develop Other Leaders

——————–
Cheryl Dilley
Cheryl Dilley 
is a Program Director at Intel Corporation
She is a transformation leader, coach, and program strategist
Email | LinkedIn WebFacebook

Image Sources: workwithjeanniealaimo.com

Leadership Pitfalls When Using Competency Modeling

What are You Best At?

Using competency modeling to develop and assess people has been in practice for leaders for a long time. There are many uses for competency modeling designed to help organizations run better, stronger, and faster.

Organizational Super Model?

For developmental purposes, we can provide feedback to individuals on their competency levels in areas deemed to be important, and then use this information for targeted development to help the organization grow.

Competency modeling is also used in assessing people to make hiring and workforce adjustment decisions.

The theory is that people with high competency levels get better business results. But does this theory hold true?

What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

So, what can possibly go wrong?

The short answer is, a lot.

Below are three situations where competency modeling can be ineffective or even counter-productive to the desired results. I invite you to add your own stories to keep this conversation alive.

3 Ways Competency Modeling Can Hurt

1) Selecting competencies which are weakly linked to business results:

Get a group of executives together and have them list what they feel are the top 15 competencies necessary for success and you will quickly generate a combined list of over 100 competencies with not a whole lot of overlap.

In a study done by the Corporate Leadership Council, competency models from several dozen companies were analyzed for commonality.

The result was a list of  about 90 competencies with significant overlap.

Realistically, you will need to narrow this list to around 15 competencies or the logistics and time spent in evaluating people can be overwhelming.

  • Selecting the ones which will have the strongest correlation to achieving your business strategy and aligning with your company’s values is no easy task.
  • Pick the wrong ones and you don’t get the results.
  • Pick too many and your processes become burdensome and time-consuming.

2) Using the results of the competency model and then focusing on unproductive areas:

When an individual receives scores on a competency assessment, the natural tendency is to focus on those areas which have the lowest ratings and then create a development plan around these weak spots.

The problem with this is that people don’t achieve great results because they fixed their weaknesses.

They make great results happen by further developing their unique strengths into towering capabilities. Think about people who you admire as great achievers and you will quickly realize that they are far from perfect.

Instead, their ability to get great results has more to do with leveraging their few towering strengths.

Yes, we do need to address those weak areas to the extent that we keep out of jail. The problem is most people focus exclusively on these weaker areas which has the collective effect of creating a workforce consisting of a bunch of clones.

3) Using competency modeling when other approaches are more appropriate:

The classic example of this is in succession management processes.

According to a number of studies including one done by the Center for Creative Leadership as well as a study I conducted, the number one way to develop people in the pipeline of leadership is to ensure they have a variety of experiences which broaden their exposure and perspective.

Companies often use competency modeling as the centerpiece of succession planning when it actually makes more sense to focus on the inventory of experiences individuals have had and which new experiences make sense for their next career moves.

A good starting point for creating an inventory of important experiences can be found in High Flyers by Morgan McCall, Jr.

Examples include experiences such as:

  • Turn-around situations
  • Line and staff positions
  • Start up ventures
  • High risk/high visibility projects
  • High growth environments
  • Downsizing
  • Diverse cross-functional leadership

Yes, competency modeling is still important, but is often better used as a developmental tool in parallel with succession planning.

What are your experiences with the use and misuse of competency modeling? Do you agree with the three examples above? If so, why? If not, why not? I would love to hear your thoughts!

**********

Never miss an issue of Linked 2 Leadership, subscribe today.
Learn, Grow & Develop Other Leaders

———————
Mike Grabarek
Mike Grabarek is managing director of Cooperative Results
He helps professionals to collectively achieve greater results
Email | LinkedIn | Web | Blog | Skype: cooperativeresults

Image Sources:  zenithdesignstudios.com

Leader Failures: The Art of Falling on Your Butt

Leader Falling Down

Not all leaders have a perfect path from inception to glory.  There are books, blogs, countless keynotes and movies filled with money-making stories of leaders overcoming failure. 

If a leader learns from mistakes made, then leadership skills can evolve, grow, and flourish.

Waiting My Turn

Like many others at my current company where I have spent the last 20 years, my role as a formal leader has increasingly been reduced. As the economy fails to recover and Baby Boomers can’t afford to retire, the heaviness at the top grows continually larger resulting in crowding in the upper layers.

Talented potential leaders are stuck below the next rung on the ladder and competition at the top breeds a cut throat “survival of the fittest” culture.

If you work for a large corporation, have you noticed this same trend?

In the “balanced world,” these great leaders would be successfully managing big teams and growing their people and the corporate revenue.

But in the real world, those talented leaders, if lucky, are put into individual contributor jobs, trying to make as much positive impact as possible in the shadows of some great and some not so great leaders who are permanently cemented in their positions.

Many leave to pursue better opportunities. If they remain, small mistakes mean big tumbles. I have made my share of skid marks, leader lessons, and recovery still-pending…

Finding Yourself On Your Butt

On Your Butt

After falling on my butt as a leader multiple times, it was extremely ironic when the analogy of falling on my butt became literal.

As a Certified Career Development Instructor, I hadn’t taught a class in over a year. I felt as an instructor, I needed to have a positive career story for my students to be inspired.

Previously, the story of being non-technical in a technical company and how I worked my way up from a temporary administrative assistant to a director of a high performing team was the motivation behind teaching.

Getting others to rise to their potential and love what they do fed my desire to teach and to grow others. My struggle to get my leader ability back on track these last few years didn’t seem like a story worth sharing. When an instructor had to cancel, I hesitantly agreed to cover.

I had taught the class many times so I wasn’t concerned on the delivery; I was concerned with my credibility.

Falling on My Butt

I was lucky that the class was extremely energetic and engaged. 30 minutes into the session, I was walking backwards (never a good idea… and in wedges none the less…) in the front of the room and tripped over a chair, landing flat on my back.

As the students gasped and I heard “are you okay?

I lay on the floor looking up at the ceiling thinking “I just fell on my butt… Wow fitting; how awesome!”

I laid there for a minute pondering my next move….

Option A:

Jump up, tell my students to play hooky the rest of the day and run out of the room?

OR

Option B:

Do the same thing I had been doing for the last few years with my leadership stumbles:  Get up, brush myself off and do my best to deliver the most awesome class ever.

I decided on the latter.

The Power of Focusing on Solutions

I do have to admit that due to my less-than-graceful stunt, the class was focused on my every move. More so for my next potential face plant than the compelling delivery of the content I am sure.

After class I had a student come up to me and say “You handled that [embarrasing situation] with such grace, what a great day!”

My response to her was “Well, what else could I do, run from the room screaming?”

The unscripted fall reminded me of the lessons I have been living as a struggling leader and that I need to keep top of mind:

  • If failure wasn’t an option for leaders, we wouldn’t have many in this world
  • Failure, if used as a vehicle to learn, adapt, improve, can help a person become a better leader
  • When you fall, get up and keep going. Even leaders are human
  • People fear perfect leaders if there is such a thing. Failure, fumbles and stumbles bring leaders a little closer to the heart of their followers.
  • Don’t blame others for your missteps. When mistakes happen, look inside first, always

I am still worn from trying to land solidly on my feet in an ever challenging environment but at least after my class experience, I know that when I literally fall on my butt, I can get back up on my feet and deliver.

What are some of your stories of failure and recovery?

**********

Never miss an issue of Linked 2 Leadership, subscribe today here! 
Learn, Grow & Develop Other Leaders

——————–
Cheryl Dilley
Cheryl Dilley 
is a Program Director at Intel Corporation
She is a transformation leader, coach, and program strategist
Email | LinkedIn WebFacebook

Image Sources: seattleinjuryaccidentlawyer.com

On Leadership and the Cultural Shadow System

Lurking in the Shadows

So, who or what do you think is really running your business? Is it something you can readily see, feel, touch, or experience on a regular basis?

Or might it be something hidden in the shadows that is actually controlling things??

Informal Influence

One of my findings of working in organizations is an unhealthy and destructive set of organizational dynamics that I call the cultural shadow system” (CSS).  This array of unseen forces operate inside the organization’s informal system and are a powerful, influential, and negative set of silent assumptions, and irrational beliefs affecting the performance and growth centers of the organization.

They work to disrupt the evolutionary development of emotional intelligence and higher state awareness within the leadership team and workforce.  They obstruct growth in the areas of leadership, culture, and socialization.

CSS infects and changes the cultural dynamics that shape individual, team and organization effectiveness, performance and awareness.  In my opinion, many of the strategy and execution failures that company’s experience today are contaminated by CSS.

“An organization can be its own worst enemy.”  - Finney and Ian Mitroff

CSS Dynamics

Silent and Destructive

CSS works partially because denialself-deceptioncollusion, and false agreement have become so common in the people systems of so many organizations.

It’s the new comfort zone.

It operates as a collection of primarily covert dynamics and affects at least four interdependent people domains.

Irrational Belief Systems

These underlying and irrational system forces operate on the organization’s work environment and infect its member’s core beliefs and behaviors.  CSS normalizes the rate of growth and decline in order to maintain (roughly) the status quo within a dysfunctional organization’s (cultural) center of gravity.  CSS is the set of informal rules devoutly believed that inform the “why, how and what to do rules” that are rigidly followed by most of the organization’s members.

It is an acute form of functional blindness affecting the corporate strategy, culture, and each individual member’s ways of working day-to-day. ~John W. Gardner

It insures a lower but accepted level of performance by making sure that members below the center of gravity are pulled up or out and members moving ahead (above) are pulled down, or out by the “center’s” informal authority system.

CSS employs various group dynamics such as peer pressure, reward and punishment practices, unhealthy norm enforcement, interpersonal approval and disapproval actions, and social acceptance and alienation mechanisms, among others to regulate the irrational and under performing center of gravity.

Obedient to the “informal rules,” the members cannot fix problems because they cannot see them.

Self Defeating Behaviors

These are used within the CSS framework and are the conscious and unconscious set of irrational behaviors that operate as accepted practices and regulate feedback and disclosure.  The result is a false reality and a lowered level of awareness of how the members and organization are really doing.

Over time (and under stress), CSS can disrupt the members’ awareness of organizational reality, preventing right actions and self critiquing and spawning catastrophic fantasies and chaotic communications that continually increase inaction, wrong action and misinformation.

These “CSS” dynamics serve to obstruct the organization’s ability to learn from its experiences, evolve, and grow into a healthy and high performance culture.

Silent Assumptions

The assumptions operating in the Informal System allow CSS to regulate the formal and informal boundaries and expectations that define the accepted range of worker behaviors.  Silent assumptions, low expectations, and false agreement operate to maintain and reinforce the veiled center of gravity.

Further, the core values that usually insure effective communications, expand member awareness, and produce truthful feedback and learning are normalized to match the center of gravity.

This can result in a suspended workplace focused entirely on maintaining the revered “center.”  As a result, rational individual and collective goals are maligned and replaced with ambiguous organizational priorities.  This process helps perpetuates the false truth around performance, progress, and results and reinforces the members’ certainty that the organization’s is succeeding.

What to Do?

To manage the CSS dynamics effectively requires a more integrative way of leading and thinking.  Leaders need more time for reflective thinking about how to develop an integral leadership style, improve organizational health, and fitness for future actions.

They must develop a psychologically safe culture that supports open and honest feedback even when it is controversial and objectively measures actual results, people systems, weaknesses, and external realities.

This will require leaders to engage in self-work, raise their awareness, and develop the ability to lead from multiple perspectives.

All while teaching, coaching, and developing others along the path to increased EI, authentic meaning, and courage in pursuing improvement, innovation, and changes that matter.

Redesigning Reality

This includes diligence in design and reinforcement of healthy cultural norms, the reflective development of deep core values, and employing a holistic leadership style in executing major change and improvement initiatives.

One of the primary goals in reducing the effects of CSS is to architect and execute a healthy, structured, and disciplined set of practices to advance the organization’s vision and strategy, organizational learning, rapid adaption capability and development of conscious leaders.

The informal systems reality of CSS requires Leading (Big L) with depth in developing, executing and communicating (actions and words) a compelling vision, values and purpose intent.

A vision anchored in integrity, a strong moral code, rich in meaning and guided by a noble purpose imperative.

The integrity of a team based management system is in no small way determined by the degree in which the teams’ behavior is authentic and honors in action the concepts of social justice, the workers freedom to do their jobs, to be himself or herself, and that fully utilizes the team’s talents within a higher stage culture and productive workplace design.

“The more we are blinded (not fully awake or aware) to these internal forces, the more likely CSS will carry us along into the unseen white waters where the power of our internal turbulence will lead us to unwanted and harmful outcomes.  The proverbial organizational train wreck silently waiting to happen…”  Doug

Can you identify with the CSS dynamic? How do Leaders focus on increasing self-awareness in the workforce? How do you define higher stage leadership in the 21st Century? Is there an implied moral code inherent in leadership?

**********

Never miss an issue of Linked 2 Leadership, subscribe today
Learn, Grow & Develop Other Leaders

——————–
Doug Ramsey is Managing Director at Designed Management, LLC
He serves with Company Building, Growth, Leadership Development, and Coaching
Email | LinkedIn | Web

Image Sources: lifelongclimb.files.wordpress.com

Leaders: True Transformation Has to Start at the Top

Transformation

There is an undeniable trend of transformation going on in corporations around the globe. 

Economic crisis, bad politics, global climate changes, survival and disruptive technology are just a few reasons behind the trend. 

Reinventing Your Leaders

Many companies, large and small have to come up with creative ways to reinvent themselves.

This requires change:

Tops down, Bottoms up, Sideways change!

Many companies not only have a focus on their product, sales approach or services reinvention, but reinvention of their leaders.  demand for newer, softer approaches to leading such as Collaboration, Emotional Intelligence, and Change Leadership are prevalent.

The Softer Side of Success

Many authors, consultants, experts are reaping the benefit of the trend.

But at the heart of the change isn’t a consultant, a nifty new diagram or model, it’s the leader himself.

I have been leading cross-company transformation efforts for most of my career whether at the micro-level of a single project or service, or at the corporate level.

From my experience, introducing the softer elements of business can be the smartest thing to do to really reach the bottom line. You can easily get an executive sponsor to champion the effort if it pertains to a new way of thinking of a project or how they do business.

Where the transformation gets dicey is when it requires personal change from those at the top, not just in voice but in actions. 

The Transformation Script

So here is the rundown of how it goes…

  • An executive staff meeting will yield a consensus of nods that “yes, the company has to change.”
  • They will debate for hours on what has to change, who has to change and how they are going to go about the change.
  • The Leader is willing to put his staff through the new academy or intensive training program and easily pays for it, allows direct reports to take the time to go through a program and even does a corporate video to rally the troops.

Now comes the real test of what does that leader have to change in himself.  It goes beyond the head nod and staff development but becomes personal development.

They get in the trap of believing they are already role modeling the new way.

Well if they were living the new way, the rest of the organization would have already followed the leader to the new normal.

Starting at the Top

For a real transformation to happen, it has to steep itself in the new culture and it has to start at the top.  The leader can’t just identify the need for change.

To be effective, he has to:

  • Lead it
  • Champion it
  • Invest time in it personally
  • Embrace it
  • Sponsor it
  • Mentor others
  • Coach them
  • Guide them

He has to walk the talk and be able to show visible change within himself for others to follow.  He has to course correct as the environment changes or the company strays from purpose.  Where I’ve seen great programs falter is at that critical point when a leader says this:

“What do you mean I have to change?” 

Efforts that don’t have this important recipe of top leader adoption die on the vine while the next new shiny object sucks up more time, energy, money and resources waiting for the next big thing to guide them on the path of transformation.

**********

Never miss an issue of Linked 2 Leadership, subscribe today here! 
Learn, Grow & Develop Other Leaders

——————–
Cheryl Dilley 
is a Program Director at Intel Corporation
She is a transformation leader, coach, and program strategist
Email | LinkedIn WebFacebook

Image Sources: ashpfoundation.org

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 37,792 other followers

%d bloggers like this: