The cultural norms here in the United States require shorter and shorter soundbites is of course a contributing factor to the rhetoric issue. We can look to the evolution of Times Square and write a book about the evolution of the U.S. communication needs!! In addition, “rhetoric” (like “politics”) has become a dirty word. Both have influenced and brought about some of the best changes in history, and yet people look like they just took a shot of sour whiskey after they hear the words or say them.

At the same time, leaders have come to rely on rhetoric AND politics to do the job for them. Why can’t leaders be more engaging so that people WANT to listen for longer than a few seconds? Isn’t “poise” a part of leadership? Shouldn’t rhetoric and politics and any other leaderly form of influence be mere tools to get the job done? Can’t we as leaders use them within an ethical framework, complete with enough integrity to earn trust and respect?

Thanks again for your post !!